• Home
Statistically Speaking
  • Home
  • Statistically Speaking
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Statistically Speaking
No Result
View All Result
Statistically Speaking
No Result
View All Result
Home Statistically Speaking

PHASE-WISE ALLOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION

TDG Network by TDG Network
September 16, 2022
in Statistically Speaking
0
74
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The scheme has witnessed large-scale allocation of foodgrains from the central government’s Food Corporation of India (FCI) pool to states. In phases I to V of the scheme, the Department of Food and Public Distribution (DFPD) allocated a total of 759 lakh Metric Tonnes (LMT) foodgrains to states and Union Territories (UTs) for distribution to around 80 crore NFSA beneficiaries.

However, of the 759 LMT foodgrains allocated to the states and UTs, a cumulative total of about 580 LMT of foodgrains was distributed to the beneficiaries in the first five phases. Cumulatively, a total of 1,003 LMT food grains have been allocated by the Centre in all six phases of which 824 LMT was distributed up till 31st July 2022. There is a clear gap between the foodgrains allocated by the Centre’s assessment of the public need and that which was effectively distributed and / or availed by the beneficiaries. The foodgrains are distributed free of cost and have entailed a fiscal bill upwards of Rs. 2.79 lakh crore in food subsidy till 31st July 2022 for the six phases.

States have recorded varying successes in the distribution of food grains. While Mizoram, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, and Sikkim were rated the best performing states in the first two phases of the scheme, Chhattisgarh, Tripura, Mizoram, Delhi, and West Bengal topped the list by the end of the third and the fourth phases. While some in the government claim that the scheme’s extension five times was proof in itself of its success, the COVID-19-induced loss of livelihood and income, accompanied by a drop in the country’s ranking in the Global Hunger Index (from 94 in 2020 to 101 in 2021), point towards the scheme’s inability to provide food security and support to the lowest income groups.

SOURCE: DNA INDIA

Previous Post

PM GARIB KALYAN ANNA YOJANA: A SEVENTH EXTENSION UNLIKELY?

Next Post

DEMAND FOR A SEVENTH EXTENSION: WHAT ARE STATES ASKING FOR?

TDG Network

TDG Network

Next Post

DEMAND FOR A SEVENTH EXTENSION: WHAT ARE STATES ASKING FOR?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News

Historic: Government introduces Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam for women’s reservation in Parliament

Historic: Government introduces Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam for women’s reservation in Parliament

November 8, 2023
‘No more MPs, Ministers’, BJP CEC decides for remaining candidate list

‘No more MPs, Ministers’, BJP CEC decides for remaining candidate list

November 8, 2023

TAMIL NADU’S TRYST WITH CINEMA AND POLITICS

January 6, 2021

Browse by Category

  • Statistically Speaking
  • Uncategorized

Statistically Speaking Join our Whatsapp channel

Statistically Speaking

© 2023 statisticallyspeaking.in

Navigate Site

  • Home

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home

© 2023 statisticallyspeaking.in

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?